Malaysia’s ASEAN chairmanship is off to a disappointing start
Excessive focus on Malaysian PM Anwar Ibrahim and no coherent early list of goals present problems.
Commentary by Bridget Welsh 2025.01.29
Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim (second from left) and Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. (right) attend the closing ceremony of the 44th and 45th ASEAN summits and for the handing over of chairmanship to Malaysia, at the National Convention Centre in Vientiane, Laos, Oct. 11, 2024.
[Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters]
There has been considerable hype around Malaysia taking over the chairmanship of Southeast Asian bloc ASEAN this year, with pundits focusing on the leadership and vision of Anwar Ibrahim, the country’s prime minister.
Early indications suggest that these expectations of Malaysia as 2025 leader of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations may be hard to fulfill.
One problem is that Malaysia’s chairmanship risks the potential of being too much about Anwar, and not enough about ASEAN.
For example, Anwar’s personal choice of ally and former Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra as an ASEAN adviser did not go down well in a politically divided Thailand. Nor did it recognize that Thaksin’s interventions around the Myanmar crisis have not helped.
Another problem is having a viable plan to meet expectations, especially as attention will focus on the pressure points facing ASEAN.
This became apparent during the first meeting of ASEAN foreign ministers in Langkawi earlier this month.
A joint statement released after this meeting was a long and unfocused laundry list of tired reaffirmations related to a wide range of issues from ASEAN’s role in regional security and economic cooperation to Israel’s actions in Gaza.
The communiqué spoke to broad ambitions, but didn’t adequately highlight ASEAN’s priority action areas. Malaysia simultaneously seemed unprepared to engage the media on its plans as chair.
If Malaysia does not create a roadmap for its goals for ASEAN in 2025, it risks wasting a vital opportunity to strengthen the Southeast Asian bloc at a critical period of uncertainty in global geopolitics, and opens itself to criticism.
Adjustments are needed. Here’s what Malaysia needs to do as ASEAN chair.
First and foremost, the regional bloc needs to be prepared to respond to threats facing Southeast Asia’s economy.
The specter of tariffs from the new Donald Trump administration in the United States has already unsettled many Southeast Asian nations.
Additionally, many of these countries run high trade deficits with the U.S., which may have put them on a Trump watch list.
ASEAN needs to maintain its regional centrality now more than ever, because current geopolitical conditions are liable to foster individualistic behavior by countries rather than cooperation.
These conditions will require ASEAN chair Malaysia to focus on fostering multilateral trade and collectively ameliorating potential economic disruptions.
If there was promise in the Langkawi meeting it was related to Malaysia’s theme for 2025 – sustainability.
The year ahead offers potential for cooperation on carbon credits and the operationalization of the much-needed ASEAN Centre for Climate Change.
Here, too, urgency is paramount as Southeast Asian nations continue to be highly vulnerable to damage from climate change.
Malaysia’s leadership of ASEAN will be successful if she puts the interests of the region’s people above those of its leaders and sets clear priorities on pressing issues with viable plans to achieve them.